Notes before reading:
1. Currently, I've got an Amanda vs dissenting voice tone. This isn't because Amanda is alone in her struggle and has no allies. She has many, I'd go so far to that she might have more allies than BFP does. The reason the tone is Amanda vs. dissenting voices is because Amanda is much more visible in discussion and debate than BFP. In many cases that I've read Amanda is dealing more with BFP advocates that BFP herself. In rereading my writing it occurred to me that I might be setting up a tone that sounded like one person was being ganged up on. I'm not sure how to fix this other than state up front that this is not the case. Sorry that I couldn't think of a better way around this problem.
For those people who follow feminist blogs even passingly, I'm sure you know the Amanda Marcotte situation. For those who don't, let me summarize what I've gathered. My understanding of what happened is that Amanda wrote an article on Alternet about immigration and it's relation to feminism. This is an issue that while recently becoming "trendy" has been discussed a lot by on many WOC blogs, BFP's (or brownfemipower) blog especially. Many people felt that Amanda had taken the ideas from BFP and others without properly crediting them. Amanda has since responded hostilely to these claims and insisted that all her inspiration came from different conference speakers.
I wish that she had just apologized and credited these other bloggers for all their work and effort, and at the same time I can understand why she didn't. She really does think (or at least writes as if she really does think) that she didn't draw any ideas from these people's works and maybe she didn't (I don't know how her mind works). She did feel very threatened by the attacks on her writing integrity and she should because they are serious attacks and something that could sink a just starting career. The other side is that I'm sure everyone was aware of how serious the claims were and I'm sure they weren't just idly made.
Obviously many people were unhappy with her response. I didn't read BFP's blog when it was up, but the cases people present for approbation of ideas are compelling. I know that I personally read a lot of people's works and definitely work off of them in ideas, direct responses and what not. I don't always source back because sometimes I don't realize I've done it until later or I don't remember who wrote what. If it had been me, I'd have been hurt by the accusation, but I probably would have given in and credited the other people because my mind is a sloppy place and for me it would probably true that BFP planted the seedling idea in my head even if I hadn't solidified it until after seeing several conferences and having time to reflect and think. My brain takes a lot of process time and requires a lot of sources and views to help me work out kinks and sometimes I don't realize who jump started what because by the time I come to a conclusion, it's so far removed from the original whatever that sparked it I just don't think on it. To be safe, when an issue like that is brought to my attention, if there's even a chance, I'd throw credit in.
Amanda either thinks there isn't a chance or she doesn't work as I do on those sort of issues. I was much more sympathetic to her case before she started commenting on Holly's feministe
post on the subject, but after she started calling people right wing nuts using smoke and fire tactics I started losing some of that sympathy. I understand she felt attacked and people react strongly toward that, but I think it's really condescending to just dismiss someone else's sincere problem or concern as being a crazy or a war starter or whatever. The concerns are real, and Amanda should have talked with BFP about the problem in a rational way and answered others questions and concerns appropriately.
I don't completely understand either extreme in the case. As Amanda sees the issue as purely one of character assassination when there are obviously several important race and priveledge issues mixed in along with good questions about what it does or doesn't mean to be a good advocate. As many people on the other side see it this has nothing to do with Amanda and everything to do with differing race and silencing issues. Both of these issues are present. I see why one would play down the other depending on where you stand. What I have problems getting is why both sides can't step down and address each in their discussions because both come into play. Maybe a lot of people feel that both aren't in play is all. Dunno.
Anyhow all this aside, Amanda's book came in and there are some really racist retro styled cartoons going on there. Holly covered this in feministe
here. As appalling as the cartoons were though, I was almost relieved, because that was something I could side on. The cartoons are racist and wrong. There is no other side to look at here. Whatever was going on, was completely wrong period, end of debate.
See since the Amanda approbation issue began, I've been trying to decide what my opinion on the whole thing is. People in the blogsphere have been actively courting my and other women's sympathies on the issue. On one side I hear
The Open Letter to White Feminists and I want to be a good advocate. I have some issues with the context of which all the quotes were taken from, but I get the idea. The same problem I have with many men when it comes to women's issues, I'm doing to other women who are facing race, sexuality, or religious issues. I agree with Cara at the Curvature that being
a good ally is complex and invariably means speaking out against discrimination as well as helping to get silenced voices heard. How Amanda handled the situation lead to silencing even if none originally occurred because she tried to shift the terms of what was happening to favor her and silence the other deeper and more important (in the big picture) concerns.
The flip side is that I can't honestly say whether approbation occurred or not. I think it's likely though probably not intentional, but I can't claim to know Amanda's inner workings. I get the anger and I see why people would want to boycott her writings, but the other side is isn't a person supposed to be innocent until she's proven guilty and if she said she didn't do it, who am I, especially as a person who hasn't read BFP's work and who hasn't heard those speakers to cast such a judgment?
So I was horrified that these kind of drawings would be included by pleased because I could put the Amanda issue to rest. Unfortunately (and fortunately, more fortunately than not really) Amanda has
apologized about the cartoons that went into her book. Not that it makes it all better, but she is taking responsibility. She is removing the images as soon as possible. She doesn't make excuses for her oversight and that's admirable. Perhaps not enough, but I'd like to think that people make mistakes, recognize them, and then try to be better people. Maybe all can't be good right away, but it's a start. Certainly I know that I have and will probably again step in it as I try to figure out where I stand and why I stand there. I'd like to think that an apology and an attempt to repair the damage I've done best as I can would open the door way for forgiveness.
I know I'm not Amanda and deciding that she's wrong and not a person to listen to doesn't make me wrong and all that. It's just that I'm trying to decide what is reasonable and what is not. For me it's easiest to do that when I think about it in terms of what I'd want or what I could feasibly do.
And I understand people who have been hurt too much to continue this discussion as well. There's only so often you can say the same thing without someone hearing you before enough is enough. I'm relatively new to blogging and paying attention to these kinds of issues. My hopes might be false and understanding flawed. I can't claim to entirely get what's going on either. I've got my take but I feel like (which means there probably is) there is something crucial I'm not seeing or getting about what's happened/happening.
On a side note, I can say that I was thoroughly unimpressed with Seal's
apology. It sounded fairly fake and even as if they were mocking people's concern. It started well, but the way that they went on to talk about how the images aren't very feminist friendly with the blond hair and the curvy body came off to me as kind of sarcastic and exasperated. I didn't like that. I felt like Seal was blowing off the issue in saying "well since none of the cartoon really supported are views and were meant to be comical you shouldn't be offended by the depictions of those with darker skin as savages". Not a helpful apology in my eyes really
I guess to conclude, I'm continuing to fence stand on the Amanda approbation issue. I won't be buying her book because even if I'm not certain about anything, I feel uneasy about the whole thing. I'll read her blog and whatever other blogs I can get my hands on because I like all the views and the different focuses on different blogs. I really hope at some point in time the feminist movement can actually take a moment and reflect on our real race and sexuality problems and move forward in a way that's beyond just having some nice conversations in name and starts reflecting in actions too.